Subject: Tags: Spam prevention:Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.Enter code: Content: KICAS_adm Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Aoki-san,Can I ask a few questions to > clarify?1. What kind of jumping is "logical > jumping"? Is it something like forgoing using one > logic for another (one that is perhaps better > suited for religious purposes)? Since you express > it as a kind of jumping I cannot help but imagine > abandoning something for something that is higher. > And once you make the jump you don't return to the > original? Or can you jump back and forth? Reading > Slides 19 and 20, the "jump" sounds more like an > "apparent gap", the two sides being > perhaps fundamentally inconsistent but > nevertheless compatible. But then jumping is > something you do, while gaps are just there.2. > Could you summarize for me what "match of > confrontation products" is? I googled but could > not find anything. And is there a strong evidence > for holding that there is an "influence" from > Nicholas of Cusa or Hegel to Kiyozawa rather than > mere "connection" or "similarity"?3. Seeing "Pure > Land Buddhism" and "Jumping" immediately made me > think of Kierkegaard, particularly about the idea > of existential leap, which is essentially a > religious jumping. If you are familiar with > Kierkegaard, could you say a few things about your > thoughts on this?Thanks!Itsuki